Skip to content
RadioHow logo — handheld two-way radio with antenna icon with the RadioHow wordmark
  • Home
  • About UsExpand
    • Contact Us
  • CB Radios
  • GMRS Radios
  • Scanners & Receivers
  • Ham Handhelds
  • CB Antennas
RadioHow logo — handheld two-way radio with antenna icon with the RadioHow wordmark

Home » Coax & Connectors

RG58 vs RG8X Coax: Which Cable Should You Choose?

Updated onOctober 28, 2026
Thinner RG-58-style and thicker RG-8X-style coaxial cables with exposed cross-sections

For the cited Belden models, RG-8X has lower attenuation than RG-58 at every listed shared frequency, while RG-58 is thinner: 0.193 in versus 0.242 in. Choose based on your run length, frequency, and routing space, and check the exact cable’s power rating before transmitting.

Contents show
1 Quick answer
2 How Do RG58 and RG8X Specifications Compare?
3 What Changes When You Install RG8X?
4 Which Cable Fits Your Run and Radio?
5 RG58 vs RG8X at a Glance
6 Frequently Asked Questions
6.1 Does replacing RG58 with RG8X affect antenna tuning?
6.2 Is RG8X suitable for outdoor or buried coax runs?
6.3 How do I identify the exact RG58 or RG8X cable specification?
6.4 How long can an RG58 or RG8X coax run be?
6.5 Does coax cable loss affect receiving as well as transmitting?
7 Conclusion
8 Sources

Quick answer

RG58 vs RG8X coax: which should you choose?

Choose RG-8X if its exact model has lower attenuation at your frequency and its larger diameter fits your route; for the cited Belden models, RG-8X measures 0.242 in and RG-58 measures 0.193 in. Estimate run loss by multiplying the cable’s dB per 100 ft by your run length in feet, then dividing by 100.

  • For less cable loss: Compare the exact cable’s attenuation at your operating frequency; Belden 9258 RG-8X has lower listed loss than 8219 RG-58 at each shared frequency.
  • For tight routing: Check the cable’s diameter and minimum bend radius; the cited Belden RG-58 is thinner and has a smaller minimum bend radius.
  • For transmitting power: Use the exact cable’s power rating at your frequency and conditions, and choose a rating above your transmitted power; the cited RG-58 datasheet has no RF power-rating table.
  • Before installation: Confirm the connector matches the cable’s diameter and construction.

How Do RG58 and RG8X Specifications Compare?

Belden’s 9258 RG-8X has lower listed attenuation than its 8219 RG-58 at every shared test frequency, while the RG-58 is thinner. At 100 MHz, loss is 3.1 versus 4.5 dB per 100 ft, respectively.

Belden cableImpedanceOutside diameter10 MHz50 MHz100 MHz400 MHz900 MHz
8219 RG-5854 Ω0.193 in (4.90 mm)1.3 dB/100 ft3.1 dB/100 ft4.5 dB/100 ft10.0 dB/100 ft16.6 dB/100 ft
9258 RG-8X50 Ω0.242 in (6.15 mm)0.9 dB/100 ft2.1 dB/100 ft3.1 dB/100 ft6.6 dB/100 ft10.7 dB/100 ft

The figures are for specific Belden models, not guaranteed values for every cable sold as RG-58 or RG-8X. At 50 MHz, for example, Davis RF lists RG-58/RG-8X loss at 4.1/2.0 dB per 100 ft, while Belden lists 3.1/2.1 dB per 100 ft for its models. Compare the exact cable’s specification at your operating frequency, since attenuation rises with frequency in the listed Belden 9258 data.

To estimate cable loss, multiply the attenuation in dB per 100 ft by your run length in feet, then divide by 100. That gives you an estimate for the cable run, not a power rating.

Belden lists the 9258 RG-8X at 1,000 W at 10 MHz and 250 W at 100 MHz; its rating falls at higher listed frequencies. The cited 8219 RG-58 datasheet provides voltage ratings but no RF power-rating table, so these specifications don’t support a matched power comparison. Check the exact cable’s rating at your operating frequency and conditions, and select a rating above your transmitted power.

What Changes When You Install RG8X?

RG8X takes more routing space than RG58, so check clearances and connector fit before you install it. In the Belden models compared here, RG8X 9258 measures 0.242 in in diameter, while RG58 8219 measures 0.193 in. That difference can matter in tight cable paths or where a connector must pass through an opening.

Bend limits also differ between those specific products: Belden specifies a 2.4 in minimum bend radius for RG8X 9258, compared with 1.9 in for RG58 8219. Plan the RG8X route with enough room to avoid bending it more tightly than its specified limit. These figures don’t establish a flexibility ranking for every cable sold as RG8X or RG58.

Choose connectors by the cable’s actual diameter and construction, rather than relying on the RG58 or RG8X label alone. Assemblies are sold with PL-259/UHF connectors for both types, but the Belden specifications don’t prescribe a connector for the radio end. Check that the connector is specified for the exact cable you’re installing, and confirm it fits your radio or other equipment.

For the rg58 vs rg8x coax installation decision, account for the route as well as the cable’s electrical specifications. Measure narrow openings and tight turns before choosing a cable, then verify the connector’s fit against the exact product details. A cable’s type designation alone doesn’t confirm that a particular connector will fit.

Which Cable Fits Your Run and Radio?

Choose RG-8X when the exact cable’s lower loss at your operating frequency matters more than its larger size; choose RG-58 when the run is short or routing space is tight, provided its specifications meet your needs. The right decision depends on your run and operating conditions, not the cable label alone.

Use the exact cable product’s data, since figures vary with construction and manufacturer.

  • For a long run or higher frequency: Favor the cable with lower attenuation at your operating frequency if reducing loss is the priority. Belden’s 9258 RG-8X has lower listed attenuation than its 8219 RG-58 at each shared frequency, but other products can differ.
  • For higher transmit power: Check the exact cable’s RF power rating at your operating frequency and conditions, and confirm it exceeds your transmitted power. Belden lists power ratings for its 9258 RG-8X, but its 8219 RG-58 datasheet provides no matched RF power-rating table, so don’t infer a rating from the RG designation.
  • For tight routing: Check the specific cable’s outside diameter and minimum bend radius against your installation space. The cited Belden 8219 RG-58 is thinner and has a smaller minimum bend radius than Belden 9258 RG-8X, but that comparison doesn’t establish a rule for every product sold under those designations.

Before ordering, verify connector fit for the cable’s actual diameter and construction. RG-58 and RG-8X labels alone don’t guarantee that a connector will fit.

RG58 vs RG8X at a Glance

RG-8X has lower listed attenuation than RG-58 at every shared frequency, while the cited RG-58 cable is thinner and has a smaller minimum bend radius. The power figures below apply only to Belden 9258 RG-8X; the cited Belden 8219 RG-58 datasheet doesn’t provide an RF power-rating table.

MeasureFrequency (MHz)RG-58 8219RG-8X 9258UnitsSource
Impedance—5450Ωcatalog.belden.com belden.com
Outside diameter—0.1930.242incatalog.belden.com belden.com
Attenuation101.30.9dB/100 ftcatalog.belden.com belden.com
Attenuation503.12.1dB/100 ftcatalog.belden.com belden.com
Attenuation1004.53.1dB/100 ftcatalog.belden.com belden.com
Attenuation40010.06.6dB/100 ftcatalog.belden.com belden.com
Attenuation90016.610.7dB/100 ftcatalog.belden.com belden.com
Power rating10—1,000Wbelden.com
Power rating50—370Wbelden.com
Power rating100—250Wbelden.com
Power rating200—190Wbelden.com
Power rating400—110Wbelden.com
Power rating700—75Wbelden.com
Power rating1,000—60Wbelden.com
Belden 8219 RG-58 and 9258 RG-8X specifications
Belden 8219 RG-58 and 9258 RG-8X specifications
— (Impedance)50
— (Outside diameter)0.242
10 (Attenuation)0.9
50 (Attenuation)2.1
100 (Attenuation)3.1
400 (Attenuation)6.6
90010.7
10 (Power rating)1,000
50 (Power rating)370
100 (Power rating)250
200190
400 (Power rating)110
70075
1,00060

Chart of the table above.

The attenuation gap grows at higher listed frequencies, so compare loss at your operating frequency and scale it to your cable run. The impedance figures differ, so check your radio and system requirements before choosing. Use the exact cable’s power rating at your operating frequency; the RG designation alone doesn’t establish a safe power limit.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does replacing RG58 with RG8X affect antenna tuning?

Usually, no: changing coax alone doesn’t change the antenna’s physical tuning, but it can change the loss between the antenna and radio. Check both cables’ impedance and the full system requirements, since the cited Belden RG-58 and RG-8X models are rated at 54 Ω and 50 Ω, respectively.

Is RG8X suitable for outdoor or buried coax runs?

RG8X can suit an outdoor run if the exact cable is rated for that installation; the RG8X label alone doesn’t establish outdoor or direct-burial suitability. Check the cable’s construction and installation instructions before routing it outside or underground, and protect the run as those instructions require.

How do I identify the exact RG58 or RG8X cable specification?

Use the manufacturer and full model number, then check that product’s datasheet for attenuation at your frequency, impedance, diameter, bend radius, and power rating. Those details can vary among cables with the same RG designation, so don’t use the type label as a substitute for the exact specifications.

How long can an RG58 or RG8X coax run be?

There’s no single maximum length; choose a run length based on the loss you can accept at your operating frequency.

Does coax cable loss affect receiving as well as transmitting?

Yes, coax loss affects both received and transmitted signals because the cable attenuates signals passing through it. Estimate loss at your operating frequency and actual run length, since attenuation rises with frequency in the cited Belden RG-8X data.

Conclusion

If your run is long or you’re operating at a higher frequency, choose the exact RG-8X cable with lower listed attenuation, as long as its diameter and bend limits fit your route. If space is tight or the run is short, RG-58 may be the simpler fit, provided its loss and power specifications meet your needs. Before buying, calculate expected loss for your run, check the cable’s rating at your operating frequency, and confirm the connector matches its construction and fits your equipment.

Sources

  1. catalog.belden.com (catalog.belden.com)
  2. 50 Ohm Coax Cable – 9258 (belden.com)
  3. davisrf.com (davisrf.com)
  4. dxengineering.com (dxengineering.com)
  5. theantennafarm.com (theantennafarm.com)
Ron Tilghman
Ron Tilghman

Ron Tilghman has installed and tuned CB and ham antennas, mobile rigs and base stations for sixteen years. SWR, grounding, coax loss and clean installs shape every setup he recommends.

Post navigation

Previous Previous
10 Best Cb Radios for 2026
NextContinue
How to Choose a Power Supply for a Ham Radio
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • HTML SITEMAP
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Affiliate Disclaimer
  • How We Research

Please keep in mind that we may receive commissions when you click our links and make purchases. However, this does not sway our reviews and comparisons. We try our best to keep things unbiased, in order to help you make the best choice. As Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

© 2026 RadioHow | All Rights Reserved.

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Linkedin
Scroll to top
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • CB Radios
  • GMRS Radios
  • Scanners & Receivers
  • Ham Handhelds
  • CB Antennas
Search